Home /
Alternatives to Microsoft Teams /
Microsoft Teams vs Mattermost
Microsoft Teams vs Mattermost
A side-by-side look at Microsoft Teams (the paid SaaS) and Mattermost (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Microsoft Teams | Mattermost | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Video, chat and collaboration bundled with Microsoft 365. | Slack-style open source team messaging. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | AGPL-3.0 / Apache-2.0 (modules) |
| Pricing | Included in Microsoft 365 from $6.99/month; Teams Essentials from $4/user/month standalone. | Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 3/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | iOS, Android |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
Enterprise teams needing Teams-like structure with compliance controls.
Mattermost strengths
- Familiar Slack-like UX.
- Strong self-hosting story and enterprise features.
- Good permission and compliance controls.
Mattermost weaknesses
- Some advanced features require paid tier.
- Mobile app performance is acceptable but not stellar.
- Larger install footprint than lightweight chats.
What's the catch with Microsoft Teams?
- Deeply tied to Microsoft ecosystem.
- Resource-heavy desktop client.
- Chat and meeting features sprawl across tabs.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Microsoft Teams: see Microsoft Teams alternatives, or learn more about Mattermost on its project page.