Home /
Alternatives to Microsoft Teams /
Microsoft Teams vs Element (Matrix)
Microsoft Teams vs Element (Matrix)
A side-by-side look at Microsoft Teams (the paid SaaS) and Element (Matrix) (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Microsoft Teams | Element (Matrix) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Video, chat and collaboration bundled with Microsoft 365. | Decentralized messaging on the Matrix protocol. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | Apache-2.0 |
| Pricing | Included in Microsoft 365 from $6.99/month; Teams Essentials from $4/user/month standalone. | Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 4/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | iOS, Android |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
Federation plus end-to-end encryption for regulated industries.
Element (Matrix) strengths
- Fully federated — you own your data.
- End-to-end encryption by default.
- Bridges to Slack, Discord, WhatsApp, etc.
Element (Matrix) weaknesses
- Self-hosting Synapse or Conduit server is work.
- E2E encryption UX (device verification) can confuse users.
- Cross-signing and key backup setup is fiddly.
What's the catch with Microsoft Teams?
- Deeply tied to Microsoft ecosystem.
- Resource-heavy desktop client.
- Chat and meeting features sprawl across tabs.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Microsoft Teams: see Microsoft Teams alternatives, or learn more about Element (Matrix) on its project page.