Home /
Alternatives to Slack /
Slack vs Element (Matrix)
Slack vs Element (Matrix)
A side-by-side look at Slack (the paid SaaS) and Element (Matrix) (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Slack | Element (Matrix) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Team messaging with channels, threads and integrations. | Decentralized messaging on the Matrix protocol. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | Apache-2.0 |
| Pricing | Free tier limited to 90 days of history; Pro from $7.25/user/month. | Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 4/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | iOS, Android |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
When end-to-end encryption is a hard requirement.
Element (Matrix) strengths
- Fully federated — you own your data.
- End-to-end encryption by default.
- Bridges to Slack, Discord, WhatsApp, etc.
Element (Matrix) weaknesses
- Self-hosting Synapse or Conduit server is work.
- E2E encryption UX (device verification) can confuse users.
- Cross-signing and key backup setup is fiddly.
What's the catch with Slack?
- Free tier message history cap makes it unusable for serious teams.
- Data residency concerns for EU and regulated industries.
- Per-seat pricing scales expensively.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Slack: see Slack alternatives, or learn more about Element (Matrix) on its project page.