Home /
Alternatives to Google Docs /
Google Docs vs CryptPad
Google Docs vs CryptPad
A side-by-side look at Google Docs (the paid SaaS) and CryptPad (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Google Docs | CryptPad | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Collaborative word processor. | End-to-end encrypted collaboration suite. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | AGPL-3.0 |
| Pricing | Free with Google account. | Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 3/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Web only |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | None official |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
End-to-end encrypted docs where the server can't read anything.
CryptPad strengths
- Zero-knowledge encryption — even the server cannot read docs.
- Includes pad, sheets, kanban, whiteboard.
- Public instance available.
CryptPad weaknesses
- Feature depth below Google Docs for heavy users.
- Search across pads is limited.
- Some editors are lighter than mainstream equivalents.
What's the catch with Google Docs?
- Data mined by Google.
- Offline support is limited.
- No self-hosted version for sensitive documents.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Google Docs: see Google Docs alternatives, or learn more about CryptPad on its project page.